Credit Analysis
REVIEW
This chapter focuses on credit analysis. It is separated into two major sections: liquidity analysis and solvency analysis. Liquidity refers to the availability of resources to meet short-term cash requirements. A company's short-term liquidity risk is affected by the timing of cash inflows and outflows along with its prospects for future performance. Our analysis of liquidity is aimed at companies' operating activities, their ability to generate profits from the sale of goods and services, and working capital requirements and measures. This chapter describes several financial statement analysis tools to assess short-term liquidity risk for a company. We begin with a discussion of the importance of liquidity and its link to working capital. We explain and interpret useful ratios of both working capital and a company's operating cycle for assessing liquidity. We also discuss potential adjustments to these analysis tools and the underlying financial statement numbers. What-if analysis of changes in a company's conditions or strategies concludes this section.
The second part of this chapter considers solvency analysis. Solvency is an important factor in our analysis of a company's financial statements. Solvency refers to a company's long-run financial viability and its ability to cover long-term obligations. All business activities of a company—financing, investing, and operating—affect a company's solvency. One of the most important components of solvency analysis is the composition of a company's capital structure. Capital structure refers to a company's sources of financing and its economic attributes. This chapter describes capital structure and explains its importance to solvency analysis. Since solvency depends on success in operating activities, the chapter examines earnings and its ability to cover important and necessary company expenditures. Specifically, this chapter describes various tools of solvency analysis, including leverage measures, analytical accounting adjustments, capital structure analysis, and earnings-coverage measures. We demonstrate these analysis tools with data from financial statements. We also discuss the relation between risk and return inherent in a company's capital structure, and its implications for financial statement analysis.
OUTLINE
Section 1: LiquidityLiquidity and Working CapitalCurrent Assets and LiabilitiesWorking Capital Measure of Liquidity Operating Activity Analysis of LiquidityAccounts Receivable Liquidity MeasuresInventory Turnover MeasuresLiquidity of Current LiabilitiesAdditional Liquidity MeasuresCurrent Assets Composition What‑If AnalysisSection 2: Capital Structure and Solvency Importance of Capital StructureCharacteristics of Debt and Equity
Common-Size Statements in Solvency Analysis
Relation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Appendix 11A: Rating Debt |
|
|
ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES
|
QUESTIONS
1. Liquidity is an indicator of an entity's ability to meet its current obligations. An entity in a weak short‑term liquidity position will have difficulty in meeting short‑term obligations. This has implications for any current and potential stakeholders of a company. For example, lack of liquidity would affect users’ analysis of financial statements in the following ways:
Equity investor: In this case, the company likely is unable to avail itself of favorable discounts and to take advantage of profitable business opportunities. It could even mean loss of control and eventual partial or total loss of capital investment.
Creditors: In this case, delay in collection of interest and principal due would be expected and there is a possibility of the partial or total loss of the amounts due them.
2. A major limitation in using working capital (in dollars) as an analysis measure is its failure to meaningfully relate it to other measure for interpretive purposes. That is, working capital is much more meaningful when related to other amounts, such as current liabilities or total assets. In addition, the importance attached to working capital by various users provides a strong incentive for an entity (especially the ones in a weak financial position) to stretch the definition of its components. For example, some managers may “expand” the definition of what constitutes a current asset and a current liability to better present their current position in the most favorable light. Moreover, there are several opportunities for managers to stretch these definitions. For this reason, the analyst must use judgment in evaluating management’s classification of items included in working capital—and apply adjustments when necessary.
3. In classification of accounts as current or noncurrent, we look to both the intentions of management and the normal practice for the industry (beyond the “longer of the operating cycle or one-year” rule). In the case of fixed assets, there is the possibility of their inclusion in current assets under one condition. The condition is that management intends to sell these fixed assets and management has a definite contractual commitment from a buyer to purchase them at a specific price within the following year (or operating cycle, if longer).
4. Installment receivables derived from sales in the regular course of business are deemed to be collectible within the operating cycle of a company. Therefore, such installment receivables are to be included in current assets.
5. Inventories are not always reported as current assets. Specifically, inventory amounts in excess of current requirements should be excluded from current assets. Current requirements include quantities to be used within one-year or the normal operating cycle, whichever period is longer. Business at times builds up its inventory in excess of current requirement to hedge against an increase in price or in anticipation of a strike. Such excess inventories beyond the requirements of one year should be classified as noncurrent.
6. Prepaid expenses represent advance payments for services and supplies that would otherwise require the current outlay of funds during the succeeding one-year or a longer operating cycle.
7. Banks usually reserve the right not to renew the whole or part of a loan at their option when they sign a revolving loan agreement. The fact that a bank agrees informally to renew short‑term notes does not make them noncurrent. The possibility that the company under analysis included such notes under long‑term liabilities should be carefully assessed (and potentially reclassified if our analysis suggests otherwise).
8. Some of these industry characteristics, such as the absence of any distinction between current and noncurrent on the balance sheet in the real estate industry, can indeed require special treatment. However, even in such cases, analysts should be careful to consider whether these "special" characteristics change the relation existing between current obligations and the liquid funds available (or reasonably expected to become available) to meet them. Our analysis should adjust the classifications of any items not meeting our assessment of the current and noncurrent criteria.
9. Identical working capital does not imply identical liquidity. The absolute amount of working capital has significance only when related to other variables such as sales, total assets, etc. The absolute amount only has, at best, a limited value for intercompany comparisons. A better gauge of liquidity when focusing on working capital is to relate its amount to either or both of current assets and current liabilities (or sales, assets, etc.).
10. The current ratio is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. It is a static measure of resources available at a given point in time to meet current obligations. The reasons for its widespread use include:
11. Cash inflows and cash outflows are not perfectly predictable. For example, in the case of a business downturn, sales can decline more rapidly than do outlays for purchases and expenses. The amount of cash held is in the nature of a precautionary reserve, which is intended to take care of short‑term surprises in cash inflows and outflows.
12. There is a relation between inventories and sales. Specifically, as sales increase (decrease), the inventory level typically increases (decreases). However, inventories are a direct function of sales only in rare cases. Methods of inventory management exist, and experience suggests that inventory increments vary not in proportion to demand (sales) but rather with measure approximating the square root of demand.
13. Management’s major objectives in determining the amounts invested in receivables and inventories include the promotion of sales, improved profitability, and the efficient utilization of assets.
14. The current ratio is a static measure. The value of the current ratio as a measure of liquidity is limited for the following reasons:
15. The limitations to which the current ratio is subject should be recognized and its use should be restricted to the type of analytical task it is capable of serving. Specifically, the current ratio can help assess the adequacy of current assets to discharge current liabilities. This implies that any excess (called working capital) is a liquid surplus available to meet imbalances in the flow of funds, shrinkage in value, and other contingencies.
16. Cash-based ratios of liquidity typically refer to the ratio of cash (including cash equivalents) to total current assets or to total current liabilities. The choice of deflator depends on the purposes of analysis. (i) The higher the ratio of cash to total current assets the more liquid the current asset group is. This means that this portion of the total current assets is subject only to a minimal danger of loss in value in case of liquidation and that there is practically no waiting period for conversion of these assets into usable cash. (ii) The ratio of cash to total current liabilities measures how much cash and cash equivalents are available to immediately pay current obligations. This is a severe test that ignores the revolving nature of current liabilities. It supplements the cash ratio to total current assets in that it measures cash availability from a somewhat different point of view.
17. An important measure of the quality of current assets such as receivables and inventories is their turnover. The faster the turnover—collections in case of receivables and sales in case of inventories—the smaller the likelihood of loss on ultimate realization of these assets.
18. The average accounts receivable turnover measures in effect the speed of their collection during the period. The higher the turnover figure, the faster the collections are, on average.
19. The collection period (or days' sales in accounts receivable) measures the number of days' sales uncollected. It can be compared to a company's credit terms to evaluate the quality of its collection activities.
20. Either one or all of the following are possible reasons for an increase in the collection period:
21. (a) If the inventory level is inadequate, the sales volume may decline to below the level of sales otherwise attainable. A loss of potential customers can also occur. (b) Excessive inventories, however, expose the company to expenses such as storage costs, insurance, and taxes as well as to risks of loss of value through obsolescence and physical deterioration. Excessive inventories also tie up funds that can be used more profitably elsewhere.
22. The LIFO method of inventory valuation in times of increasing costs can render both the inventory turnover ratio as well as the current ratio practically meaningless. However, there is information regarding the LIFO reserve that is reported in financial statements. Use of the LIFO reserve enables the analyst to adjust an unrealistically low LIFO inventory value to a more meaningful inventory amount. Still, in intercompany comparative analysis, even if two companies use LIFO cost methods for their inventory valuations, the ratios based on such inventory figures may not be comparable because their respective LIFO inventory pools (bases) may have been acquired in years of significantly different price levels.
23. The composition of current liabilities is important because not all current liabilities represent equally urgent and forceful calls for payment. Some claims, such as for taxes and wages, must be paid promptly regardless of current financial difficulties. Others, such as trade bills and loans, usually do not represent equally urgent calls for payment.
24. Changes in the current ratio over time do not automatically imply changes in liquidity or operating results. In a prosperous year, growing liabilities for taxes can result in a lowering of the current ratio. Moreover, in times of business expansion, working capital requirements can increase with a resulting contraction of the current ratio—so-called "prosperity squeeze." Conversely, during a business contraction, current liabilities may be paid off while there is a concurrent (involuntary) accumulation of inventories and uncollected receivables causing the ratio to rise. Finally, advances in inventory practices (such as just-in-time) can lower the current ratio.
25. "Window dressing" refers to the adjustment of year‑end account balances of current assets and liabilities to show a more favorable current ratio than is otherwise warranted. This can be accomplished, for example, by temporarily stepping up the efforts for collection, by temporarily recalling advances and loans to officers, and by reducing inventory to below the normal level and use the proceeds from these steps to pay off current liabilities. The analyst should go beyond year‑end reported amounts and try to obtain as many interim readings of the current ratio as possible. Even if the year‑end current ratio is very strong, interim ratios may reveal that the company is dangerously close to insolvency. More generally, our analysis must always be aware of the possibility of window dressing of both current and noncurrent accounts.
26. The rule of thumb regarding the current ratio is 2:1 — a value below that level suggests serious liquidity risk. Also, the rule of thumb suggests that the higher the current ratio be above the 2:1 level, the better. The following points, however, should be kept in mind so as not to expose our analysis to undue risks of errors in inferences:
27. In an assessment of the overall liquidity of a company’s current assets, the trend of sales is an important factor. Since it takes sales to convert inventory into receivables and/or cash, an uptrend in sales indicates that the conversion of inventories into more liquid assets will be easier to achieve than when sales remain constant. Declining sales, on the other hand, will retard the conversion of inventories into cash and, consequently, impair a company’s liquidity.
28. In addition to the tools of analysis of short‑term liquidity that lend themselves to quantification, there are important qualitative considerations that bear on short‑term liquidity. These can be usefully characterized as depending on the financial flexibility of a company. Financial flexibility is the ability of a company to take steps to counter unexpected interruptions in the flow of funds. This refers to the ability to borrow from a variety of sources, to raise equity capital, to sell and redeploy assets, and to adjust the level and direction of operations to meet changing circumstances. The capacity to borrow depends on numerous factors and is subject to rapid change. It depends on profitability, stability, relative size, industry position, asset composition and capital structure. It will depend, moreover, on such external factors as credit market conditions and trends. The capacity to borrow is important as a source of funds in a time of need and is also important when a company must roll over its short‑term debt. Prearranged financing or open lines of credit are more reliable sources of funds in time of need than is potential financing. Other factors which bear on the assessment of the financial flexibility of a company are the ratings of its commercial paper, bonds and preferred stock, restrictions on the sale of its assets, the degree of discretion with its expenses as well as the ability to respond quickly to changing conditions such as strikes, shrinking demand, and cessation of supply sources.
The SEC requires a "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" (MD&A). This requirement includes a discussion of liquidity factors—including known trends, demands, commitments or uncertainties likely to have a material impact on the company's ability to generate adequate amounts of cash. If a material deficiency in liquidity is identified, management must discuss the course of action it has taken or proposes to take to remedy the deficiency. In addition, internal and external sources of liquidity as well as any material unused sources of liquid assets must be identified and described.
29. The importance of projecting the effects of changes in conditions and policies on the cash resources of a company is to allow for proper planning and control. For example, if management decides to ease the credit terms to its customers, knowing the impact of the new policy on cash resources will help it make a more informed decision. It may seek improved terms from suppliers or make arrangements to obtain a loan.
30. Key elements in evaluating long‑term solvency are:
31. Analysis of capital structure is important because the financial stability of a company and the risk of insolvency depend on the financing sources as well as on the type of assets it holds and the relative magnitude of such asset categories. Specifically, there are essential differences between debt and equity, which are the two major sources of funds. Equity capital has no guaranteed return that must be paid out and there is no timetable for repayment of the capital investment. From the viewpoint of a company, equity capital is permanent and can be counted on to remain invested even in times of adversity. Therefore, the company can confidently invest equity funds in long‑term assets and expose them to the greatest risks. On the other hand, debts are expected to be paid at certain specified times regardless of a company's financial condition. To the investor in common stock, the existence of debt contains a risk of loss of investment. The creditors would want as large a capital base as is possible as a cushion that will shield them against losses that can result from adversity. Therefore, it is important for the financial analyst to review carefully all the elements of the capital structure.
32. Financial leverage is the result of borrowing and incurring fixed obligations for interest and principal payments. The owners of a successful business that requires funds may not want to dilute their ownership of the business by issuing additional equity. Instead, they can "trade on the equity" by borrowing the funds required, using their equity capital as a borrowing base. Financial leverage is advantageous when the rate of return on total assets exceeds the net after-tax interest cost paid on debt. An additional advantage provided by financial leverage is that interest expense is tax deductible while dividend payments are not.
33. Leverage is a two‑edged sword. In good times, net income benefit from leverage. In a recession or when unexpected adverse events occur, net income can be harmed by leverage. Therefore, the use of leverage is acceptable to the financial markets only up to some undefined level. Ninety percent is higher than that “acceptable” level. Specifically, at 90 percent debt to total capital, future financing flexibility would be extremely limited, lenders would not loan money, and equity financing may cost more than the potential returns on incremental investments. Also, a 90 percent debt level would make net earnings extremely volatile, with a sizable increase in fixed charges. The incremental cost of borrowing, including refunding of maturing issues, increases with the level of borrowing. A 90 percent debt level could pose the probability of default and receivership in the event that something goes wrong. The financial risk of such a company would be much too high for either stockholders or bondholders.
34. In an analysis of deferred income taxes, the analyst must recognize that under normal circumstances the deferred tax liabilities will “reverse” (become payable) only when a firm shrinks in size. Shrinkage in firm size is usually accompanied with losses instead of with taxable income. In such circumstances, the “drawing down” of the deferred tax account is more likely to involve credits to tax loss carryforwards or carrybacks, rather than to the cash account. To the extent that a future reversal is only a remote possibility, the deferred credit should be viewed as a source of long-term funding and be classifiable as part of equity. On the other hand, if the possibility of a drawing down of the deferred tax account in the foreseeable future is high, then the account, or a portion of it, is more in the nature of a long‑term liability.
35. The accounting requirements for the capitalization of leases are not rigorous and definite enough to insure that all leases that represent, in effect, installment purchases of assets are capitalized. Consequently, the analyst must evaluate leases that have not been capitalized with a view to including them among debt obligations. Leases which cover most (say 75‑80 percent) of the useful life of an asset can generally be considered the equivalent of debt financing. (See Chapter 3 for additional analysis and discussion.)
36. Off-balance-sheet financing are attempts by management to structure transactions in such a way as to exclude debt (and related assets) from the balance sheet. This is usually accomplished by emphasizing legal (accounting) form over substance. Examples of such transactions are take or pay contracts, certain sales of receivables, and inventory repurchase agreements.
37. Pension accounting recognizes that if the fair value of pension assets falls short of the accumulated pension benefit obligation, a liability for pensions exists. However, this liability normally does not take into consideration the projected benefit obligation that recognizes an estimate for future pay increases. When pension plans base their benefits on future pay formulas, the analysts, who judge such understatement as serious and who can estimate it, may want to adjust the pension liability for analysis purposes.
38. The preferred method of presenting the financial statements of a parent and its subsidiary is in consolidated format. This is also the preferred method from an analysis point of view. However, separate financial statements of the consolidated entities are necessary in some cases, such as when the utilization of assets of a subsidiary (such as an insurance company or a bank) is not subject to the full discretion of the parent. Information on unconsolidated subsidiaries is also important when bondholders of such subsidiaries must look only to a subsidiary’s assets as security. Moreover, bondholders of the parent company (particularly holding companies) may derive a significant portion of their fixed charge coverage from the dividends of the unconsolidated subsidiaries. Yet, in the event of the subsidiary's bankruptcy, the parent bondholders may be in a junior position to the bondholders of the subsidiary.
39. a. Generally, the minority interest is shown among liabilities in consolidated financial statements. However, the minority interest differs from debt in that it has neither mandatory dividend payment requirements nor principal repayment requirements. Therefore, for the purpose of capital structure analysis, it may be classified as equity rather than as a liability.
b. The purpose of appropriating retained earnings is to "set aside" a certain portion of retained earnings to prevent them from serving as a basis for the declaration of dividends. There exists no claim by an outsider to such an appropriation until the contingency materializes. Therefore, unless the reason for the amount reserved is certain to occur, such appropriations should be considered a part of equity capital.
c. A guarantee for product performance is the result of a definite contract with the buyer that commits the entity to correct product defects. Therefore, it is a potential liability and should be classified as such.
d. Convertible debt is generally classified among liabilities. However, if the terms of conversion and the market price of the common stock are such that it is most likely to be converted into common stock, it should be considered as equity for the purpose of capital structure analysis.
e. Most preferred stock entails no absolute obligation for payment of dividends or repayment of principal—that is, it possesses characteristics of equity. However, preferred stock with a fixed maturity or subject to sinking fund requirements should, from an analysis point of view, be considered as debt.
40. a. The equity of a company is measured by the excess of total assets over total liabilities. Accordingly, any analytical revision of asset book values (from amounts reported at in the financial statements) yields a change in the amount of equity. For this reason, in assessing capital structure, the analyst must decide whether or not the book value amounts of assets are realistically stated in light of analysis objectives.
b. The following are examples of the need for possible adjustments. Different or additional adjustments may be needed depending on circumstances: (1) Inventories carried at LIFO are generally understated in times of rising prices. The amount by which inventories computed under FIFO (which are closer to replacement cost) exceed inventories computed under LIFO is disclosed as the LIFO reserve. These disclosures should enable the analyst to adjust inventory amounts and the corresponding equity amounts to more realistic current costs. (2) For fiscal years beginning before 12/16/93, marketable securities were generally stated at cost, which may be below market value. Using parenthetical or footnote information, the analyst can make an analytical adjustment increasing this asset to market value and increasing owner's equity by an equal amount. (3) Intangible assets and deferred items of dubious value, which are included on the asset side of the balance sheet, have an effect on the computation of the total equity of a company. To the extent that the analyst cannot evaluate or form an opinion on the present value or future utility of such assets, they may be excluded from consideration, thereby reducing the amount of equity by the amounts at which such assets are carried. However, the arbitrary exclusion of all intangible assets from the capital base is an unjustified exercise in over-conservatism.
41. Long‑term creditors are interested in the future operations and cash flows of a debtor (in addition to the short‑term financial condition of the debtor). For example, a creditor of a three‑year loan would want to make an analysis of solvency assuming the worst set of economic and operating conditions. For such purposes, an analysis of short‑term liquidity is usually not adequate. However, such a dynamic analysis for the long term is subject to substantial uncertainties and requires assumptions for a much longer time horizon. The inevitable lack of detail and the uncertainties inherent in long‑term projections severely limit their reliability. This does not mean that long‑term projections are not useful. What it does mean is that the analyst must be aware of the serious limitations to which they are subject.
42. Common‑size analysis focuses on the composition of the funds that finance a company. As such, it reflects on the financial risk inherent in the capital structure. Specifically, it shows the relative magnitudes of the financing sources of the company and allows the analyst to compare them with similar data of other companies. Instead, capital structure ratios reflect on the financial risk of a company by relating various components of the capital structure to each other or to total financing. An advantage of ratio analysis is that it can be used as a screening device and, moreover, can reflect on relations across more than one financial statement.
43. The difference between the book value of equity capital and its market value is usually due to a number of factors. One of these is the effect of price‑level changes. These, in turn, are caused by at least two factors: change in the purchasing power of money and change in price due to economic factors such as the law of supply and demand. Therefore, with fluctuating prices, it is unlikely that historical cost will correspond to market value. Accounting methods in use can also significantly affect the book values of assets. For example, a particular depreciation method often is adopted for tax reasons rather than to measure the loss of value of an asset due to use or obsolescence. The analyst could potentially adjust for this distortion of current value by valuing the equity at market value. For actively traded securities this would not be too difficult. However, the stock market too is often subject to substantial overvaluation and undervaluation depending on the degree of speculative sentiment. Hence, in most cases, equity capital will not be adjusted to market—instead, the focus will be on valuing assets and liabilities, with equity as a residual value.
44. Since liabilities and equity reveal the financing sources of a company, and the asset side reveals the investment of these funds, we can generally establish direct relations between asset groups and selected items of capital structure. This does not, of course, imply that resources provided by certain liabilities or equity should be directly associated with the acquisition of certain assets. Still, it is valid to assume that the types of assets a company employs should determine to some extent the sources of resources used to finance them. Therefore, to help assess the risk exposure of a given capital structure, the analysis of asset distribution is one important dimension. As an example, if a company acquired long‑term assets by means of short‑term borrowings, the analyst would conclude that this particular method of financing involves a considerable degree of risk (and cost).
45. The earnings to fixed charges ratio measures directly the relation between debt‑related and other fixed charges and the earnings available to meet these charges. It is an evaluation of the ability of a company to meet its fixed charges out of current earnings. Earnings coverage ratios are superior to other tools, such as debt-to‑equity ratios, which do not focus on the availability of funds. This is because earnings coverage ratios directly measure the availability of funds for payment of fixed charges. Fixed charges are mainly a direct result of the incurrence of debt. An inability to pay their associated principal and interest payments represents the most serious risk consequence of debt.
46. Identifying the items to include in "fixed charges" depends on the purpose of the analysis. Fixed charges can be defined narrowly to include only interest and interest equivalents or broadly to include all outlays required under contractual obligations—specifically:
(a) Interest and interest equivalents:
(b) Other outlays under contractual obligations:
(c) Other fixed charges—such as imputed interest in the case on non‑interest or low interest‑bearing obligations. These are not periodical fund drains.
For each of the above categories, the corresponding income to be included in the ratio computation should be adjusted accordingly. Regarding fixed charges, those items not tax deductible must be tax adjusted. This is done by increasing them by an amount equal to the income tax that would be required to obtain an after‑tax income sufficient to cover the fixed charges. The tax rate to be used should be based on the relation of the taxes on income from continuing operations to the amount of pre-tax income from continuing operations—the company's effective tax rate.
47. A company normally signs a long‑term purchase contract to either insure that its supply of essential raw material is not interrupted or to get a favorable purchase discount, or both. In times of favorable economic conditions, the analyst need not worry about most such commitments (indeed, they are a positive factor). The only exception is when such commitments reflect amounts in excess of requirements given expected sales. Accordingly, if the analyst concludes that the purchase commitments represent the minimum required supplies, s/he can justifiably exclude the commitments from fixed charges. If the analyst includes the commitments in fixed charges, income should be adjusted to reflect the tax-deductible nature of the purchase that will eventually be recorded as cost of goods sold. Proceeds from the forced sale of excess supplies can also be deducted on an estimated basis.
48. Net income includes items of revenue that do not generate immediate cash. It also includes expenses that do not require the immediate use of cash. For a measure of cash available to meet fixed charges, the more relevant figure is "cash provided by operations" reported in the statement of cash flows. Net income can sometimes be used as a proxy of this more appropriate measure of cash availability.
49. Since Company B is under the control of Company A, the latter can siphon off funds from it to the detriment of B's creditors. Moreover, the customer‑supplier relationship with Company A means that Company A has considerable discretion in the allocation of revenues, costs, and expenses among the two entities in such a way as to determine which company will show what portion of the total available income. This again can work to the detriment of Company B's creditors. As a lender to Company B, one would want to write into the lending agreement conditions that would prevent parent Company A from exercising its controlling powers to the detriment of the lender.
50. Debt can never be expected to carry the risks and returns of ownership because of the fixed nature of its rewards. Also, it cannot serve as the permanent risk capital of a company because it must be repaid with interest. Moreover, debt is incurred on the foundation of an equity base. Indeed, equity financing shields or at least reduces the risks of debt financing. Equity financing also absorbs the losses to which a company is exposed. Consequently, the assertion is basically accurate.
51. The advantages of convertible debt are that the company is able to potentially enlarge its equity base (and/or at a potentially lower cost) than it might otherwise be able to with pure equity financing. Also, it might be able to sell equity shares at a price in excess of the current market price and to obtain, in the interim, a lower interest cost because of the conversion feature of the debt. The disadvantages are that a subsequent decline in the market price of the stock can postpone conversion substantially and indefinitely. This would leave the company with a debt burden that it was not prepared to shoulder over the long term. Consequently, what may have been conceived of as temporary financing can, in fact, become long‑term debt financing.
52. (a) Long-term indentures span such an extended period of time that they are subject to many uncertainties and imponderables. Consequently, long‑term creditors often insist on the maintenance of certain ratios at specified levels and/or controls over specific managerial actions and policies (such as dividends and capital expenditures). However, no restrictive covenant or other contractual arrangement can prevent operating losses, which present the most serious risk to long-term creditors.
(b) 1. Maintenance of a minimum degree of short‑term liquidity.
53. The major reason why debt securities are rated while equity securities are not rest in the fact that there is a far greater uniformity of approach and homogeneity of analytical measures used in the evaluation of credit worthiness than there is in the evaluation of equity securities. This increased agreement on what is being measured in credit risk analysis has resulted in widespread acceptance of and reliance on published credit ratings in many sectors of the analyst community.
54. In rating an industrial bond issue, rating agencies focus on the issuing company's asset protection, financial resources, earning power, management, and the specific provisions of the debt security. Asset protection is concerned with measuring the degree to which a company's debt is covered by its assets. Financial resources encompass, in particular, such liquid resources as cash and other working capital items. Future earning power is a factor of great importance in the rating of debt securities because the level and the quality of future earnings determine importantly a company's ability to meet its obligations. Earnings power is generally a more reliable source of security than is asset protection. Management abilities, philosophy, depth, and experience always loom importantly in any final rating judgment. Through interviews, field trips and other analyses the raters probe into management's goals, the planning process as well as strategies in such areas as research and development, promotion, new product planning and acquisitions. The specific provisions of the debt security are usually spelled out in the bond indenture.
EXERCISES
Current Ratio Quick Ratio Working Capital
1.* No change No change No change
2. No change No change No change
3. Increase Increase Increase
4. Decrease No change Decrease
5. Decrease Decrease Decrease
6. Decrease Decrease Decrease
7. Increase Increase No change
8. Decrease Decrease No change
9. Increase Increase Increase
10. No change Decrease No change
* Assumes a sufficient amount is provided for in the Allowance for Bad Debts.
Exercise 10-2 (30 minutes)
1. NE NE D COGS 500 Cost of goods sold increases by 500;
R.E. 500 average inventory increases by 250; ratio (c) decreases.
2. I D NE Accts Recble Denominator will increase by half the
Sales amount of the numerator causing the (a) ratio to increase. Denominator of ratio (b) will increase causing the ratio to decrease. There is no effect on the components of ratio (c).
3. I D NE Allow for Bad Debts The numerator in ratio (a) won't change
Accts Recble and the denominator will decrease thus increasing the ratio. Because ratio (a) will increase, ratio (b) will decrease as the average accounts receivable turnover increases. Ratio (c) is unaffected.
4. I D NE Bad Debt Expense Ratio (a) will increase due to the
Accts Recble decrease in the denominator. Ratio (b) will decrease due to the increase in the denominator, which is due to the increase in ratio (a). Ratio (c) is unaffected.
5. NE NE I COGS Only ratio (c) is affected. The numerator
Inventory increases while the denominator decreases.
6. NE NE I R.E. 500 Neither ratio (a) nor (b) are affected. The
COGS 500 average inventory will decrease by 50% of the decrease in the numerator in ratio (c) due to the averaging effect, thus increasing the ratio.
Exercise 10-3 (30 minutes)
(a) (b) (c) Journal Entry Explanation
1. NE NE NE Allow for Bad Debts Since we use the net A.R. in
Accts Recble computation of ratio, there is no effect.
2. NE NE D COGS Neither ratio (a) nor (b) is affected. The
R.E. cost of goods sold increases by $1,000,
and average inventory will increase by $500 (due to the averaging effect), thus decreasing ratio (c).
3. NE NE I COGS Only ratio (c) is affected. The
Inventory numerator increases while the
denominator decreases.
4. NE NE I Loss Neither ratio (a) nor (b) is affected.
Inventory Average inventory will decrease by
$1,500 (half of $3,000), increasing ratio (c).
5. NE NE I R.E. Neither ratio (a) nor (b) is affected. The
COGS average inventory will decrease by half
of the decrease in the numerator.
6. I D NE Sales Denominator of ratio (a) decreases by
Accts Recble half the amount the numerator decreases, causing ratio (a) to increase. Denominator of ratio (b) will increase, causing it to decrease. There is no effect on ratio (c).
Exercise 10-4 (45 minutes)
a. Methods to window dress financial statements to improve the current and quick ratios:
1. Pay off accounts payable with cash. This would have the effect of reducing both current assets and current liabilities by the same amount, thus increasing the current ratio and quick ratio.
2.* Invest additional capital funds at year‑end. This would increase cash without affecting current liabilities.
3.* Sell fixed assets for cash or short‑term notes. This would increase current assets, but decrease only fixed assets. Thus, the current and quick ratios would improve.
4.* Borrow cash by incurring long‑term liabilities (notes or bonds). This would increase cash, but would not affect current liabilities, since the purpose is to make them long‑term liabilities.
5.* Defer incurring various expenses, such as advertising, research and development, and marketing, along with reducing capital expenditures.
6. Keep the cash receipts books open longer, in an effort to show higher receivables or collections. This method is a highly irregular and manipulative device.
* These procedures are normal business transactions that cannot usually be considered manipulative in character. They may become manipulative when they have no sound business justification and are undertaken solely to influence the measures used by outside analysts.
Exercise 10-4—concluded
b. The analyst could, if all underlying evidence and documents were available, detect each of these methods. However, sufficient evidence, such as invoices and the books of original entry, will most likely not be available for inspection. Moreover, these methods may not be recognizable through the usual analysis of financial statements of the company. If sufficient evidence were available, the following are techniques that may be used to detect the methods described in a.
1. The analyst could determine the company's usual payment policies, and compare them with those employed at year‑end. S/he could look at the terms of the liabilities, to see if they were paid at the most beneficial time—in other words, if any economic benefit was derived by paying them earlier than due or when normally paid. S/he could inspect the payments in the first month of the following year, to see if liabilities were paid disproportionately to year‑end, taking into account due dates and normal requirements. An unusually low inventory at year‑end might also indicate failure to purchase merchandise at year‑end in an effort to improve the quick ratio.
2. The analyst could analyze the timing of investments and the use to which they were put. If s/he sees large capital infusions at year‑end, and that these investments were represented by idle cash, or by marketable securities which are not related to operations, and where there is little probability of such funds being required for operations in the near future, the reason might be window dressing.
3. Contracts and invoices might be examined to see when they were entered into and when they were recorded.
4. The procedures for investigation of excessive borrowing at year‑end are the same as those for excessive investments of equity funds (2. above). Also, the contracts should be studied to determine if they are bona fide loans.
5. The purchase journal and cash disbursements journal should be examined to compare expenses incurred towards the end of the year with expenses at the beginning of the following year, and the reasons for large differences.
6. To determine if the books are being kept open too long, the analyst would study such documents as the underlying invoices and canceled checks to determine their actual dates, and to compare this with the dates recorded. S/he might also confirm material accounts with customers as of the year‑end.
Exercise 10-5 (30 minutes)
A* B* C* D*
1. NE NE I/I=D I/I=D
2. D/NE=D D/NE=D D/D=I D/D=I
3. I/NE=I I/NE=I I/I=D I/I=D
4. NE/I=D NE/I=D I/I=D I/I=D
5. NE NE D/NE=D NE
6. NE NE NE I/NE=I
7. NE NE I/I=D I/I=D
8. NE NE D/D=I D/D=I
9. D/I=D D/I=D NE NE
* Ratio codes and definitions:
A. Total debt / Total equity
B. Long‑term debt / Total equity
C. [Pre-tax earnings + Fixed charges (FC)] / FC
PROBLEMS
a. Short‑term liquidity ratios for Campbell Soup:
1. [36] / [45] = $1,665.5 / $1,298.1 = 1.28
2. ($80.7 [31] + $22.5 [32] + $624.5 [33]) / $1,298.1 [45] = 0.56
3. $6,205.8 [13] / [($624.5 [33] + $564.1)/2] = 10.44
4. $4,258.2 [14] / [($819.8 [34] + $816.0)/2] = 5.21
5. $624.5 [33] / ($6,205.8 / 360) = 36.23
6. $819.8 / ($4,258.2 / 360) = 69.31
7. 36.23 + 69.31 = 105.54
8. ($80.7 + $22.5) / $1,665.5 = 0.062
9. ($80.7 + $22.5) / $1,298.1 = 0.0795
10.
Ending inventory…………………… |
$ 819.8 [34] |
|
+Cost of goods sold…………………. |
4,258.2 [14] |
|
- Beginning inventory.………………. |
816.0 (given) |
|
- Depreciation…………………………. |
184.1 [187] |
|
=Purchases.…………………………… |
$4,077.9 |
|
($525.2 [41] / ($4,077.9 / 360) = 46.36
11. 105.54 - 46.36 = 59.18
12. $448.4 [64] / $1,298.1 [45] = 34.54%
Problem 10-1—concluded
c. Current assets using FIFO = $1,665.5 [36] + $84.6 [153] = $1,750.1
COGS (FIFO) = COGS (LIFO) + ΔLIFO reserve
= $4,258.2 + [$84.6 - ($904 - $816)] = $4,254.8
1. $1,750.1 / $1,298.1 = 1.35
4. $4,254.8 / [($904.4 + $904)/2] = 4.71
5. $624.5 [33] / ($6,205.8 [13] / 360) = 36.23
6. $904.4 / ($4,258.2 / 360) = 76.46
7. 36.23 + 76.46 = 112.69
d. Disregarding, for purposes of this analysis, the prepaid expenses and similar unsubstantial items entering the computation of the current ratio, we are left with the four major elements that comprise this ratio—those are cash, accounts receivable, inventories, and current liabilities. If we define liquidity as the ability to balance required cash outflows with adequate inflows, including an allowance for unexpected interruptions of inflows or increases in outflows, we must ask: Does the relation of these four elements at a given point in time:
1. Measure and predict the pattern of future fund flows?
2. Measure the adequacy of future fund inflows in relation to outflows?
Unfortunately, the answer to both of these questions is primarily no. The current ratio is a static concept of what resources are available at a given moment in time to meet the obligations at that moment. The existing reservoir of net funds does not have a logical or causal relation to the future funds that will flow through it. Yet it is the future flows that are the subject of our greatest interest in the assessment of liquidity. These flows depend importantly on elements not included in the ratio itself, such as sales, profits, and changes in business conditions. There are at least three conclusions that can be drawn:
These conclusions obviously limit the value of the current ratio as an index of liquidity. Moreover, given the static nature of this ratio and the fact that it consists of items that affect liquidity in different ways, we must exercise caution in using this ratio as a measure of liquidity.
Problem 10-1—concluded
e. Accounts receivable turnover rates or collection periods can be compared to industry averages or to the credit terms granted by the company. When the collection period is compared with the terms of sale allowed by the company, the degree to which customers are paying on time can be assessed. In assessing the quality of receivables, the analyst should remember that a significant conversion of receivables into cash, except for their use as collateral for borrowing, cannot be achieved without a cutback in sales volume. The sales policy aspect of the collection period evaluation must also be kept in mind. A company may be willing to accept slow‑paying customers who provide business that is, on an overall basis, profitable; that is, the profit on sale compensates for the extra use by the customer of the company funds. This circumstance may modify the analyst's conclusions regarding the quality of the receivables but not those regarding their liquidity.
The current ratio computation views its current asset components as sources of funds that can, as a means of last resort, be used to pay off the current liabilities. Viewed this way, the inventory turnover ratios give us a measure of the quality as well as of the liquidity the inventory component of the current assets. The quality of inventory is a measure of the company's ability to use it and dispose of it without loss. When this is envisaged under conditions of forced liquidation, then recovery of cost is the objective. In the normal course of business, the inventory should, of course, be sold at a profit. Viewed from this point of view, the normal profit margin realized by the company assumes importance because the funds that will be obtained, and that would theoretically be available for payment of current liabilities, will include the profit in addition to the recovery of cost. In both cases, costs of sales will reduce net proceeds. In practice, a going concern cannot use its investment in inventory for the payment of current liabilities because any drastic reduction in normal inventory levels will surely cut into the sales volume. The turnover ratio is a gauge of liquidity in that it conveys a measure of the speed with which inventory can be converted into cash. In this connection, a useful additional measure is the conversion period of inventories.
Future Technologies, Inc.
Cash Forecast
For Year Ended December 31, Year 2
Cash, January 1, Year 2 $ 42,000
Cash Collections
Accounts receivable, Jan. 1,Year 2 $ 90,000
Sales* 472,500
562,500
Less discount on sales [a] (945)
Less acct. rec., Dec. 31, Year 2 [b] (72,188) 489,367
Cash Disbursements
Purchases [c] 356,760
Less: Acct. pay., Dec. 31, Year 2 [d] (132,511) 302,249
Other expenses—Cash [e] 116,550 429,599
Cash available, Dec. 31, Year 2 $ 101,768
Cash needed for equipment (175,000)
Cash balance desired (30,000)
Deficiency in Cash (need to borrow) $(103,232)
* Sales: $450,000 x 1.05 = $472,500
Cost of goods sold $312,000 x .98 = $305,760
[a] $472,500 x 10% x 2% = $945 (discount on sales)
[b] $472,500 x 90% x (60/360) = $70,875
$472,500 x 10% x (10/360) = 1,313 $72,188 (Accounts receivable, Dec. 31, Year 2)
[c]
Year 2 Cost of goods sold..…………... |
|
$305,760 |
Ending inventory……………………….. |
|
90,000 (given) |
Goods available for sale.……………... |
|
$395,760 |
Beginning inventory…………………… |
|
39,000 |
Purchases……………………………….. |
|
$356,760 |
[d] Accounts Pay., 12/31/Year 2 = Yr 2 Purchases x (A.P., 12/31/Year 1 / Yr 1 Purchases)
Accounts Pay., 12/31/Year 2 = $356,760 x ($78,000 / $210,000) = $132,511
[e] Year 1
Sales………………………………… |
$ 450,000 |
Cost of goods sold………………. |
(312,000) |
Depreciation……………………….. |
(15,000) |
Net income…………………………. |
(12,000) |
Other expenses…………………… |
$ 111,000 |
Other expenses (Year 2) = $111,000 x 1.05 = $116,550
RAM Corporation
Cash Forecast before Policy Changes
For Year Ended December 31, Year 2
Cash, January 1, Year 2…………………… $ 80,000
Cash Collections
Sales (800,000 x 110%)………………. 880,000
Less: Accounts recble., Dec. 31 [a].. (165,000) 865,000
Total cash available ……………………….. 945,000
Cash Disbursements
Accounts payable, Jan. 1……………. $130,000
Purchases [b]………………………….. 657,000
Less: Accounts pay., Dec. 31 [c]…... (244,000) 543,000
Increase in notes payable…………... (15,000)
Accrued taxes…………………………. 20,000
Cash expenses [d]……………………. 258,500
806,500
Net cash flow………………………………... $138,500
Cash balance desired……………………… 50,000
Cash excess…………………………………. $ 88,500
Notes:
[a] 360 days / ($800,000/$150,000) = 67.5 days
Applied to Year 2 sales: $880,000 x (67.5/360) = $165,000
[b]
Year 2 Cost of sales ($520,000 x 110%)……………… |
$572,000 |
Ending inventory (given)…………………………… |
150,000 |
Goods available for sale…………………………… |
722,000 |
Beginning inventory………………………………… |
65,000 |
Purchases…………………………………………….. |
$657,000 |
[c] Purchases x (Year 1 Accounts payable / Year 1 Purchases)
= $657,000 x ($130,000 / $350,000) = $244,000
[d] Gross profit ($880,000 - $572,000)…………………… $308,000
Less: NI (110% of $20,000 Year 1 NI) +
(10% of Year 1 depreciation*) ($22,000 + $2,500)… $24,500
Depreciation noncash……………………………….. 25,000 49,500
Other cash expenses $258,500
* Depreciation expense is not expected to increase by 10%.
a. What-If Analysis of Proposed Credit Policy Change
A.R., Dec. 31 [$880,000 (sales) x (90/360)]……. |
$ 220,000 |
Less A.R. from forecast statement (above)..... |
165,000 |
Additional cash needed………………………… |
55,000 |
Cash excess (above)……………………...…….. |
88,500 |
Cash excess for this proposal………………… |
$ 33,500 |
b. What-If Analysis of Proposed Collection Period Change
A.R., Dec. 31 [$880,000 (sales) x (120/360)]…… |
$ 293,000 |
Less A.R. from statement (above)…………….. |
165,000 |
Additional cash needed…………………………. |
128,000 |
Cash excess (above)…………………………….. |
88,500 |
Cash to be borrowed…………………………….. |
$ 39,500 |
c. What-If Analysis of Proposed Payment Period Change
A.P., Dec. 31 [$657,000 (purch.) x (60/360)]…. |
$109,500 |
A.P. from statement (above)……………………... |
244,000 |
Additional cash needed………………………… |
134,500 |
Cash excess (above)……………………………. |
88,500 |
Cash to be borrowed……………………………. |
$ 46,000 |
Top Corporation
Cash Forecast
For Year Ended December 31, Year 6
Cash balance (1/1/Year 6)……………….. |
|
|
|
$ 35,000 |
|||
Cash receipts |
|
|
|
|
|||
Accounts receivable, Jan. 1..…... |
|
|
$ 75,000 |
|
|||
Sales…………………………………. |
|
|
412,500 |
|
|||
Accounts receivable, Dec. 31 |
|
|
|
|
|||
(Sales, $412,500 x 90/360)…….. |
|
|
(103,125) |
|
|||
Cash receipts….…………………… |
|
|
|
384,375 |
|||
Total cash available……………………... |
|
|
|
$419,375 |
|||
Cash disbursements |
|
|
|
|
|||
Accounts payable, Jan. 1 .……… |
$ 65,000 |
|
|
|
|||
Purchases [1]……………………… |
331,750 |
|
|
|
|||
Accounts payable, Dec. 31 ……… |
(122,000) |
|
274,750 |
|
|||
Payment of notes payable………. |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|||
Accrued taxes……………………… |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|||
Cash expenses [2]………………… |
|
|
110,250 |
396,500 |
|||
Estimated cash balance…………………. |
|
|
|
$ 22,875 |
|||
Minimum cash balance desired………. |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|||
Required to borrow………………………. |
|
|
|
$ 27,125 |
|||
Notes:
[1]
Beginning inventory……………………. |
$ 32,000 |
+ Purchases (plug)……………………… |
331,750 |
Goods available for sale.………………. |
363,750 |
- Ending inventory………………………. |
75,000 |
Cost of sales ($412,500 x .70)………… |
$288,750 |
[2]
Gross profit (30% of sales)……………… |
$123,750 |
Depreciation ($25,000 - $21,500)……….. |
3,500 |
Net income (excludes other expenses).. |
120,250 |
Other expenses (plug)………………….… |
110,250 |
Net income (given)………………………... |
$ 10,000 |
Problem 10-5 (60 minutes)
a. Relevant information that probably can be derived from the notes to the financial statements includes:
1. Details of Gant's bank credit, including total line of credit, portion currently unused, interest rates, and terms of credit.
2. Impacts of any consolidated subsidiaries on the liquidity of the consolidated balance sheet of Gant. Subsidiaries usually maintain separate credit facilities; therefore, solvency of a subsidiary may not necessarily be accessible to the parent company's creditors.
3. Gant's pension funding obligations. Is there an unfunded liability? If so, what are the future financial obligations?
Additional relevant information that you should attempt to obtain from Gant's management includes:
4. Prior years’ (and/or quarterly) statements of cash receipts and payments.
5. Forecasts statement (one or more years) of due dates and amounts for its receivables and payables.
6. Budget of planned capital expenditures.
7. Budget of planned long‑term financing.
b. Qualitative assessments that you would want to make regarding Gant Corporation and its industry include:
1. Financial flexibility of Gant in terms of its ability to liquidate assets without affecting profitability.
2. Level of inflation (prices changes) applicable to Gant and its industry (including those for raw materials, unionized labor, product price flexibility).
3. Gant's competitiveness in the domestic industry (that is, how up‑to‑date is its plant and equipment?). Also, will major capital expenditures be required in the near term?
4. How does the industry and Gant compete internationally? Are there adverse international industry developments beyond the control of Gant?
In addition to these general qualitative assessments of Gant, you would want to consider the following more specific qualitative assessments:
5. Cost Control Program:
How has the cost cutting program impacted its financial flexibility?
How lean is its operations?
Are there assets that can be disposed of without impacting productivity or profitability negatively?
Has the program been too intense such that long‑term opportunities are lost?
6. "Commodity" Orientation of Product Line:
What has happened with commodity prices over the past several years?
Are the markets for Gant's various product lines soft?
7. U.S. Plant Facilities:
How has the strength/weakness in the U.S. dollar affected the company's competitive position over the past years?
How competitive is Gant internationally?
Will it be forced to diversify its operations internationally and/or upgrade plant productivity?
How would a major sustained capital expenditure program affect solvency?
Problem 10-6 (60 minutes)
a.
1. Current ratio
Year 5: $61,000/$40,000………………. 1.5
Year 6: $84,000/$54,000………………. 1.6
2. Days' sales in receivables
5: ($20,000 / ($155,000/360)…………... 46
6: ($25,000 / ($186,000/360)…………... 48
3. Inventory turnover
5: $99,000/[($32,000+$38,000)/2]…….. 2.83
6: $120,000/[($38,000+$56,000)/2]…… 2.55
4. Days' sales in inventory
5: $38,000/($99,000/360)………………. 138
6: $56,000/($120,000/360)…………….. 168
5. Days' purchases in accounts payable
5: $23,000/($105,000* /360)…………… 79
6: $29,000/($138,000* /360)…………… 76
Cost of sales……………………... |
$ 99,000 |
$120,000 |
+ Ending inventory……………… |
38,000 |
56,000 |
Goods available for sale……….. |
137,000 |
176,000 |
- Beginning inventory…………... |
32,000 |
38,000 |
Purchases………………………… |
$105,000 |
$138,000 |
6. Cash flow ratio
5: $7,700 / $40,000………………….…. 0.19
6: $6,400 / $54,000………………….…. 0.12
b. Most of the liquidity measures of ZETA do not reveal any significant changes from Year 5 to Year 6. However, there is some deterioration in the inventory turnover. This deterioration is even more evident in the days' sales in inventory measures. Moreover, the liquidity index also suggests that the liquidity position of ZETA has deteriorated from Year 5 to Year 6. Also notice that because of a lower level of operating cash flows, the cash flow ratio shows a significant decline. Still, due to the short time span of this analysis, one would want to examine another year or two (say, Years 3 and 4) to see if these changes reflect a longer-term trend in liquidity.
Problem 10-7 (90 minutes)
a. Summary of Ratio Analysis Results
b. Dell’s balance sheet is strong, with little long-term debt and significant equity capital. Solvency risk is low, given the low debt level in relation to equity, and cash from operations is significantly greater than total long-term liabilities.
Problem 10-8 (75 minutes)
a. Computation of Year 10 capital structure and solvency ratios for Campbell requires that we determine the following component measures for Year 10:
Equity Capital
1. $2,250.0 / $1,865.7 = 1.21
2. $2,250.0 / $4,115.6 = 0.55
3. ($805.8 + $117.6 + $28.5) / $1,865.7 = 0.51
4. $1,865.7 / $2,250.0 = 0.83
5. $1,717.7 [37] / $1,865.7 = 0.92
6. $1,298.1 / $2,250.0 = 0.58
7.
Ratio = $306.2 / $142.7 = 2.14
8.
* CFO [64] $448.4 + Current tax expense $171.1 [124A] = $619.5
Ratio = $751.9 / $142.7 = 5.27
9. $367.4 / $2,250.0 = 0.16
Problem 10-8—concluded
b. We would compute the total debt to total capitalization as follows:
(a) Long-term debt
(b) Other liabilities
(c) Deferred income taxes (assuming 100% considered as liabilities)
(d) a + b + c
(e) Total equity
(f) Minority interests
Probably the closest we can come to reconstruct Campbell's computation of 33.7%, item [12], is as follows: ($805.8 + $28.5) / ($834.3 + $1,691.8) = 33%. This computation omits deferred taxes and minority interests.
Problem 10-9 (45 minutes)
a. 1. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:
Ratio = $4,880 / $560 = 8.71
2. Ratio of Cash From Operations to Fixed Charges:
Ratio = $6,220 / $560 = 11.11
3. Earnings Coverage of Preferred Dividends:
$4,880 / {$560 + [$400/(1 - 0.40)] } = 3.98
b. The company's coverage ratios suggest the existence of sufficient earnings and cash flows to cover its fixed charges. There is no evidence of concern from any of these three coverage ratios. For a more complete analysis, we would want to collect values from other firms (competitors) and additional prior years for comparative analyses.
Problem 10-10
a. 1. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Ratio = $7,700 / $1,720 = 4.48
2. Ratio of Cash From Operations to Fixed Charges
Ratio = $10,400 / $1,720 = 6.04
3. Earnings Coverage of Preferred Dividends:
Ratio = $7,700 / {$1,720 + [$400/(1 - .40)] } = 3.23
b. The company's coverage ratios suggest the existence of sufficient earnings and cash flows to cover its fixed charges. There is no evidence of concern from any of these three coverage ratios. For a more complete analysis, we would want to collect values from other firms (competitors) and additional prior years for comparative analyses.
Problem 10-11 (40 minutes)
a. 1. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Share of minority interest 600 ____
Ratio = $7,680 / $1,720 = 4.47
2. Ratio of Cash From Operations to Fixed Charges
Ratio = $9,360 / $1,720 = 5.44
3. Earnings coverage of preferred dividends:
Ratio = $7,280 / {$1,720 + [$400/(1 - .40)] } = 3.05
b. Based on the calculations in part a, the supervisor's concerns about the coverage ratios are misplaced. Indeed, the company's coverage ratios suggest the existence of sufficient earnings and cash flows to cover its fixed charges. There is no evidence of concern from any of these three coverage ratios. For a more complete analysis, we would want to collect values from other firms (competitors) and additional prior years for comparative analyses.
Problem 10-12 (50 minutes)
Interest incurred calculation
6.0% of 17,500 = 1,050 1,425
Sinking Fund Debentures 6.5% of 10,000 = 650
Total interest incurred $2,075
a. Earnings Coverage Ratio on the First Mortgage Bonds (pre-tax basis)
(1) 3.3 [based on Year 7 earnings, ($4,750 / $1,425)]
(2) 3.1 [based on 5‑year average, {($4,750+$4,500+$4,500+$4,250+$4,000)/5}/$1,425]
Earnings Coverage Ratio on the Sinking Fund Debentures (pre-tax basis)
(1) 7.3 [based on Year 7 earnings, ($4,750 / $650)]
(2) 6.8 [based on 5‑year average, {($4,750+$4,500+$4,500+$4,250+$4,000)/5}/$650]
b. Long-Term Debt to Equity Ratio
Ratio = $35/$47 = 0.74 à 74% of capital is debt
Of equity capital, 42.6% ($20,000*/$47,000) is senior to common stock
$1.10 preferred dividend—tax adjusted [(300,000)($1.1)]/(1-.50)..... 660
(1) 1.7 = [based Year 7 earnings, ($4,750 / $2,735)
(2) 1.6 = [based on 5-year average, ($4,400 / $2,735)
d. Earnings per Share Computation Assuming Conversion
$4,750 Year 7 earnings before interest and taxes
(2,075) Interest expense
$2,675 Pre‑tax income
(1,337) Taxes (50%)
$1,338 After-tax income
(330) $1.10 preferred dividends (300,000 shares x $1.10)
$1,008 Available for common shareholders
¸1.8 mil Common shares 1 mil. + 0.8 mil. (Class A Conversion)
$ 0.56 Earnings per share
Problem 10-13 (45 minutes)
a. Computation of Income and EPS under Debt vs. Equity Financing
Debt Equity
b. Computation of EPS Equality between Debt and Equity Financing
* EBIT = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.
Solving for EBIT yields:
EBIT = $8,200,000
Interpretation: When income before interest and taxes is at $8,200,000, stockholders are indifferent between the debt or equity financing plans.
Problem 10-14 (55 minutes)
a. 1. Guaranteed Subsidiary Debt. Add $250,000,000 to both long-term debt and to fixed assets. Rationale: Under the equity method of accounting for joint ventures, the debt incurred is not reported on the balance sheet of the partners and therefore, this debt should be reflected in the adjusted debt ratio since Lubbock has guaranteed the total indebtedness of the joint venture.
2. LIFO Reserve. Add $200,000,000 to both inventory and to retained earnings (ignoring potential tax effects). Rationale: Under LIFO accounting, Lubbock will report current costs for inventory transactions in its income statement but its balance sheet amount for ending inventory will reflect “first‑in, still‑here,” or FISH. Accordingly, the SEC requires companies using LIFO to disclose in notes to the financial statements the amounts by which LIFO inventories must be increased to reflect current costs. Lubbock reports that under FIFO, its inventories would have exceeded reported amounts by $200,000,000. Accordingly, to reflect current costs, inventories should be stated on the adjusted basis of FIFO; also, retained earnings (excluding tax effects) should be credited by the same amount that inventories are debited by. An alternative approach is to recognize a deferred tax liability of $200,000 x current marginal tax rate.
3. Operating Leases. These long-term operating leases could be capitalized. The present value of these long-term leases must be calculated using a discount rate. Assuming 10% is the interest rate implicit in the lease, the present value is approximately $750,000,000. The present value amount should be added to long term debt and to fixed assets.
b. Long-Term Debt to Long-Term Capitalization Before Adjustments ($ millions):
Long-term debt
= $675 / ($675 + $100 + $400 + $1,650) = 23.9%
Long-Term Debt to Long-Term Capitalization After Adjustments ($ millions):
Long-term debt + Guaranteed debt + Leases
Long-term debt + Minority interest + Shareholders' equity +
Guaranteed debt + Inventory Adjustment + Leases
= ($675+$250+$750) / ($675+$100+$400+$1,650+$250+$200+$750) = 41.6%
c. 1. Two points: (i) For fiscal years beginning before 12/16/93, marketable securities were valued at the lower of cost or market under SFAS 12 (for marketable equity securities) and ARB 43 (for marketable debt securities). During this period the market value of securities were sometimes substantially higher than shown on the balance sheet, requiring analytical adjustment. Under current practice, all marketable securities (except held-to-maturity debt securities) are valued at market. Hence, only held-to-maturity debt securities are potentially subject to market adjustment. (ii) An analyst must realize that the longer the elapsed time since the balance sheet date the greater the likelihood that market values for marketable securities have changed. Hence, for comparative analysis spanning several years, adjustments to market may be necessary for investment securities.
2. Deferred income taxes are created when a company uses different accounting methods for income tax and financial reporting such that so-called timing differences in income occur. One school of thought argues that deferred taxes should be recognized as a liability. The presumption is that timing differences will reverse in the future and the taxes will become payable or that changes in the tax law could accelerate payment of such taxes. Opponents argue that deferred taxes should be included in shareholders' equity. The presumption here is that timing differences are unlikely to reverse and therefore the balance in deferred taxes will continue to grow and not become payable. This means that the long-term debt ratio of a company would be adversely affected if deferred taxes are considered long-term debt (first viewpoint); however, this ratio would be favorably impacted if such taxes are considered as part of shareholders' equity (second viewpoint).
Problem 10-15 (75 minutes)
a. Ratio Computations
1. Year 5: $57,200a/ $105,000b = 0.55
Year 6: $82,600a/ $138,000b = 0.60
aIncludes: (1) Total current liabilities,
(2) Long‑term debt due after one year, and
(3) Deferred income taxes
bIncludes: (1) All items in (a) above, as well as
(2) Minority interest, and
(3) Stockholders' equity
2. Year 5: $57,200 / $47,000 = 1.22
Year 6: $82,600 / $54,000 = 1.53
3. Year 5: $17,200a/ $47,800b = .36
Year 6: $28,600a/ $55,400b = .52
aIncluding deferred taxes.
bStockholders' equity + minority interest.
* Loss per income statement (additional 300 added back in SCF represents dividends received).
Year 6
**From the statement of cash flows (income minus dividends received).
aPre-tax income
bInterest incurred ‑ interest capitalized
cAmortization of bond discount
dInterest portion of operating rental expense
eAmount of previously capitalized interest amortized in this period
fReversal of undistributed income (loss) of associated companies
gInterest incurred
Problem 10-15—concluded
Fixed charges**
* Depreciation added back already includes amortization of interest previously capitalized.
**As computed in (4) above.
Year 5: [$7,700 + ($7,800-$1,000) + $7,016] / $7,016 = 3.07
Year 6: [$6,400+($10,000-$1,600)+$11,800]/ $11,800 = 2.25
b. Analysis and Interpretation
The financial leverage index, which underwent only minimal change, is at a level suggestive of leverage benefits to ZETA's stockholders. There also has been a marked increase in leverage as is indicated by the total debt to equity and the long‑term debt to equity measures. With total liabilities exceeding equity by over 50 percent, the level of liabilities is significant. The relation of long‑term debt to equity is at a somewhat lower level. The earnings and cash flow coverage of fixed charges are low on an absolute basis and have declined from Year 5 to Year 6. This decline is primarily because fixed charges increased faster than net income. Finally, operating cash flows declined in Year 6 compared to Year 5.
Problem 10-16 (60 minutes)
a. Ratios Based on Projected Year 7 Data
b. Effect of Year 7 Merger on the Ratios and Creditworthiness of BRT
Problem 10-16—concluded
Currently, the BRT bonds are trading as BB-rated bonds. Prior to the merger, BRT’s ratios approximated a weak BB credit. After the merger, all the ratios declined below values representative of a BB credit rating except the ratio of debt to total assets, which maintained a BB credit quality. Several other factors may cause further deterioration in the financial strength of BRT. First, a large portion of assets is now intangible, which introduces the potential for overstating current values (or, at the very least, it increases uncertainty). The value of the intangibles is best measured by their ability to generate revenues. Recent results suggest that ability is suspect. Second, BRT is not generating sufficient income to cover interest expenses. This lack of sufficient income makes it difficult to provide for capital expenditures to maintain and build its current business. Third, with the weakening financial structure of BRT, the company has further reduced its flexibility to compete in a highly competitive environment.
Additional contributing factors include management’s focus on aggressive expansion at the expense of bondholders’ interests and the competitive pressures created by government regulation of the industry. The cumulative effect of declining financial ratios, potentially overvalued assets, reduced ability to meet capital expenditure needs, and reduced financial flexibility to compete in a highly competitive industry, have a negative impact on BRT’s creditworthiness. It is recommended that Clayton sell the BRT bonds in anticipation of a widening spread between BRT bonds and U.S. Treasuries. This widening spread relative to Treasuries will cause the bonds to underperform as the market adjusts the values of the bonds in line with comparable lower-credit-quality bonds.
(CFA adapted)
Problem 10-17 (50 minutes)
Recommendation: Buy the Patriot Manufacturing bonds.
Quantitative Support for Recommendation: The ratio information shows that Patriot is less risky than Sturdy Machines. First, the pre-tax interest coverage of Sturdy Machines is just over 1.0 versus Patriot’s 6.1. Second, Patriot’s cash flow to total debt is higher than Sturdy Machines and is improving. Third, Patriot’s total debt to capital ratio is lower than Sturdy Machines and it is decreasing.
Qualitative Support for Recommendation: At least three qualitative factors support this recommendation. First, Patriot’s credit rating is improving as evidenced by its recent ratings upgrade. Sturdy Machines, on the other hand, is a deteriorating credit, as evidenced by its recent credit rating downgrade. Second, given that the recency of the credit-rating changes, one would expect no change (or continued increases) in the rating of the Patriot bonds and no change (or continued decreases) in the rating of the Sturdy Machines bonds. Third, we anticipate that the Patriot bonds will fall in yield (rise in price). Sturdy Machines’ bonds appear to be riskier than Patriots’ bonds.
(CFA adapted)
CASES
Case 10-1 (90 minutes)
a.
FAX Corporation
Forecasted Statement of Cash Receipts and Payments
For Year Ended December 31, Year 2
Notes
[1] Sales for Year 2 = Sales for Year 1 x 115% = $960,000 x 1.15 = $1,104,000
[2] Ending A.R. = Average daily sales x Collection period
= $1,104,000 x 90/360 = $276,000
[3] Purchases (Year 2) = COGS + Ending inventory - Beginning inventory
COGS (Year 2) = COGS (Year 1) x 110% = $550,000 x 1.1 = $605,000
Average Inventory = COGS / Average inventory turnover
= $605,000 / 5.5 = 110,000
Ending inventory = (Average inventory x 2) - (Beginning Inventory)
= $110,000 x 2 - $112,500 = $107,500
Purchases (Year 2) = $605,000 + $107,500 - $112,500 = $600,000
Case 10-1—concluded
Notes—continued
[4] Ending A.P. = Purchases (Year 2) x (Beg. A.P. / Year 1 Purchases)
= $600,000 x ($60,000 / $480,000) = $75,000
[5] Cash expenses (Year 2) = Selling and Admin. expenses + Taxes paid
S&A (Year 2) = S&A (Year 1) x 110% = $160,000 x 1.1 = $176,000
Income tax expense for Year 2= [Sales - (COGS + Depreciation + S&A)] x .48
= [$1,104,000 - ($605,000 + ($30,000 x 1.05) + $176,000] x .48
= $139,920
Cash expenses (Year 2) = $176,000 + $139,920 = $315,920
Case 10-2 (90 minutes)
a.
Beginning cash balance…………………… $ 30,000
Add: Cash receipts
Beg. accounts receivable…………. $ 52,000
+Sales for Year 2 [1]……………….. 1,104,000
- Ending accounts receivable [2]... (276,000)
Cash collections….…………………. 880,000
Total cash inflows…………………………... 910,000
Deduct: Cash disbursements
Beg. accounts payable…………….. 60,000
+Purchases for Year 2 [3]…………. 582,667
- Ending accounts payable [4]……. (77,689)
Payments to creditors……………… 564,978
Payments for cash expenses [5]…. 315,920
Payment of notes payable………… 20,000
Payment of long‑term debt………... 25,000
Total cash disbursements………………… 925,898
Net cash flow………………………………... $ (15,898)
Less: Minimum cash balance…………….. (20,000)
Cash borrowings expected……………….. $ (35,898)
Notes
[1] Year 2 Sales = Year 1 Sales x 115% = $960,000 x 1.15 = $1,104,000
[2] Ending A.R. = Average daily sales x Collection Period
= ($1,104,000/360) x 90 = $276,000
[3] Year 2 Purchases = COGS + Ending inventory - Beginning inventory
Year 2 COGS = Year 1 COGS x 110% = $550,000 x 1.1 = $605,000
Average inventory = COGS / Average inventory turnover
= $605,000 / 6 = $100,833.33
Ending inventory = (Average inventory x 2) - (Beginning Inventory)
= ($100,833.33 x 2) - $112,000 = $89,667
Year 2 Purchases = $605,000 + $89,667 - $112,000 = $582,667
[4] Ending A.P. = Year 2 Purchases x (Beg. A.P. / Year 1 Purchases)
= $582,667 x ($60,000/$450,000) = $77,689
[5] Year 2 cash expenses:
Year 1 selling and admin expense x 110% = $160,000 x 1.10 = $176,000
Year 2 income tax expense = [Sales - (COGS + Depr. + Selling & admin exp.)] x .48
= [$1,104,000 - ($605,000 + ($30,000 x 105%) + $176,000)] x .48 = $139,920
Cash expenses = $176,000 + $139,920 = $315,920
b. From the analysis in part a, it is predicted that FAX will need to borrow $35,898 in Year 2.
Case 10-3 (75 minutes)
a.
1. Working capital
Current assets 342,000 198,000
Current liabilities 177,800 64,800
Working capital 164,200 133,200
2. Current ratio 1.92 3.06
3. Acid‑test ratio
[($12,000 + $183,000) / $177,800] 1.10
[($15,000 + $80,000) / $64,800] 1.47
4. Accounts receivable turnover
$1,684,000 / [($183,000 + $80,000) / 2] 12.81
$1,250,000 / [($80,000 + $60,000) / 2] 17.86
5. Collection period of receivables
360 / 12.81 28.10
360 / 17.86 20.16
6. Inventory turnover ratio
($927,000 / [($142,000 + $97,000) / 2] 7.76
($810,000 / [($97,000 + $52,000) / 2] 10.88
7. Days to sell inventory
360 / 7.76 46.39
360 / 10.88 33.09
8. Debt‑to‑equity ratio
(120 + 30 + 147.8) / (110 + 94.2) 1.46
(73 + 14.4 + 50.4) / (110 + 60.2) 0.81
9. Times interest earned
$87,000 / $12,000 7.25
$43,300 / $7,300 5.93
b.
Sales………………………………… |
160.4 |
119.0 |
100.0 |
Cost of goods sold……………….. |
181.1 |
158.2 |
100.0 |
Gross profit………………………… |
140.7 |
81.8 |
100.0 |
Marketing and administrative…. |
143.2 |
84.8 |
100.0 |
Net income…………………………... |
112.5 |
54.0 |
100.0 |
Case 10-3—concluded
c. A loan should not be granted, as it appears that the overall financial position of the company is deteriorating. The following points should be noted:
1. The current ratio went down from 3.06 to 1.92.
2. A similar reduction occurred in the acid‑test ratio, indicating the company is in a weaker position.
3. Accounts receivable turnover decreased while the collection period increased. This indicates a greater investment in receivables although the collection period of 28 days is still within the firm's terms of net 30 days.
4. The inventory turnover deteriorated from 10.88 to 7.76 and the days to sell inventory increased to 46 days from 33 days. This means that the firm is carrying a larger investment in inventories, which ties up its badly needed quick assets. In addition, the risk of obsolete inventory is increased.
5. Debt‑to‑equity ratio increased drastically. Both the short‑term and long‑term debt were affected. The firm will probably experience difficulty in meeting its current maturities (see current and acid‑test ratio declines) because the firm is financing its increased working capital needs with debt instead of with equity.
Before any loans are made to the company, management must address the issues above and an improved financial condition must be demonstrated.
Case 10-4 (85 minutes)
a. The following eight considerations are relevant for discussions with management and beginning the task of credit analysis:
1. Economic cyclicality. How closely do the tobacco, food, and beverage industries track GNP? Is tobacco consumption more tied to sociopolitical and regulatory factors than to economic ones? Cyclicality of an industry is the starting point an analyst should consider in reviewing an industry. A company's earnings growth should be compared against the growth trend of its industry, with significant deviations carefully analyzed. Industries may be somewhat dependent on general economic growth, demographic changes, and interest rates. In general, however, industry earnings are not perfectly correlated with any one economic statistic. Not only are industries sensitive to many economic variables, but often segments within a company or industry move with different lags in relation to the overall economy.
2. Growth prospects. Are the businesses that Altria is operating within growing at a steady pace, or is growth slipping? Will European consumption of cigarettes begin to slow as they have in the U.S. due to more no smoking regulations? Related to the issue of growth, is there consolidation going on in tobacco, food or beverages? Alternate growth scenarios have different implications for a company. With high‑growth industries, the need for additional capacity and related financing is an issue. With low‑growth industries, movements toward diversification and/or consolidation strategies are a possibility. As a general proposition, companies in high‑growth industries have greater potential for credit improvement than companies operating in lower-growth industries.
3. Research & development. R&D activities are not large in the tobacco, food or beverage industries, although expenditures are directed at new product development. In general, it is safe to characterize these businesses as having a stable product line that will not vary much over time. For firms relying on such expenditures to maintain or improve market position, it is important to assess whether the company in question has the financial resources to maintain a leadership position or at least expend a sufficient amount of money to keep technologically current.
4. Competition. How competitive are these industries? Are there players who are out to gain market share at the expense of profits? Is the industry trending toward oligopoly, which would make small companies in the industry vulnerable to the economies of scale the larger companies bring to bear? Economic theory shows us how competition within an industry relates to market structure and has implications for pricing flexibility. An unregulated monopoly is in position to price its goods at a level that will maximize profits. Most industries, however, encounter free market forces and cannot price their goods/services without consideration of supply and demand as well as the price charged for substitute goods/services. Oligopolies often have a pricing leader. Analysts must be concerned about small companies in an industry that is trending toward oligopoly. In such an environment, the small company's production costs may exceed those of the industry leaders. If a small firm is forced to follow the pricing of the industry leaders, the firm may be driven out of business.
Case 10-4—concluded
5. Sources of supply. Are these businesses vulnerable to the cost of production inputs? Or is the market position of Altria such that it can easily pass on higher raw material costs? Industry market structure often has a direct impact on sources of supply. From a competitive standpoint, the company that controls its factors of production is in a superior position.
6. Degree of regulation. Tobacco has faced some regulatory hurdles in the past (especially the recent past), as has food and beverage to a lesser degree. What does the future hold in this area? The analyst should be concerned with the direction of regulation and its effect on future profitability.
7. Labor. Are these businesses heavily unionized? What is the status of labor‑management relations? When the labor market is "tight," this is an important consideration in nonunionized companies.
8. Accounting. Do these businesses have any unique accounting practices that warrant special attention? As stressed throughout the text, an analyst must become familiar with industry accounting practices before proceeding with a company analysis. To assess whether a company is liberal or conservative in applying GAAP industry practices should be examined.
b. 1a. Ratios for Altria for Year 9 before the acquisition of Kraft are:
Pretax interest coverage = ($4,820+$500)/$500 = 10.64
LT debt as % of capitalization = $3,883/($3,883+$9,931) = 28.11%
CF as % of total debt = ($2,820+$750+$100-$125)/($3,883+$1,100) = 71.14%
1b. Ratios for Altria for Year 9 pro forma for the acquisition of Kraft are:
Pretax interest coverage = ($4,420+$1,600)/$1,600 = 3.76
LT debt as % of capitalization = $15,778/($15,778+$9,675) = 61.99%
CF as % of total debt = ($2,564+$1,235+$390-$125)/($15,778+$1,783) = 23.14%
2. Relating these ratios to the median ratios for the various bond rating categories places Altria in the position shown below:
Before Kraft Ratio Implied Rating
Recommendation: These ratios suggest that Altria bonds have deteriorated from a strong A rating to a BB rating, based on the median ratios for the various bond categories. Given that Altria is in relatively stable businesses (food and tobacco) that tend to be much less cyclical than the economy overall, an argument could be made that its bonds should be rated as a strong BB or even a BBB.
a.
Moderate deterioration, but nothing serious. The large increase in the goodwill account is evidently a factor.
Modest improvement.
Good improvement due to more rapid growth in retained earnings.
Slight improvement.
Liquidity Year 7 Year 9
Its petrochemicals acquisitions have increased ABEX's working capital requirements, particularly accounts receivable and inventories.
The greater working capital requirements have evidently forced ABEX to rely more heavily on short‑term debt.
Earning Power Year 7 Year 9
Pretax interest coverage is similar between Year 7 and Year 9, although it was significantly higher in Year 8 (2.54). Higher operating margins and improved cash flow helped in supporting the higher debt burden. This is especially evident in the operating cash flow to long-term debt ratio.
b. Among the more qualitative considerations that should be reviewed in assessing the risk of downgrade are:
(1) Economic cyclicality: The petrochemical business is likely to be more cyclical than the pipeline business, which is regulated and generally more of a cost pass‑through operation.
(2) Growth prospects: Petrochemicals may have greater growth prospects than the pipeline business, but that growth is likely to be more erratic, due to economic cyclicality.
(3) Competition: The lack of regulation and the commodity nature of most of its products makes the petrochemical business generally more competitive than the pipeline business.
(4) Sources of supply: Both the petrochemical and the pipeline businesses have to deal with the problem of securing sufficient supplies of raw material. Again, the petrochemical business is probably more prone to disruption than the pipeline business.
Other possible considerations include:
c. One might conclude from the qualitative considerations in part b that the shift toward petrochemicals makes ABEX more vulnerable to the vagaries of the economic cycle. If so, this will lead to a more volatile earnings stream going forward. To this extent, there is some pressure for a rating downgrade.
Looking at the ratio analysis in part a, one might conclude that there is relatively little deterioration in credit quality. The modest deterioration in asset protection seems to be offset by higher cash flow margins, which allows the company to support the higher debt burden. However, the greater reliance on short‑term debt to finance the increased working capital requirements is somewhat troublesome.
Beginning cash balance…………………… |
|
|
|
$ 30,000 |
Add: Cash Receipts |
|
|
|
|
Beginning accounts receivable…. |
|
$ 52,000 |
|
|
+Sales for Year 2 [1]………………. |
|
1,104,000 |
|
|
- Ending accounts receivable [2]... |
|
(276,000) |
|
|
Cash collections……………………. |
|
|
|
880,000 |
Total cash inflows…………………………... |
|
|
|
910,000 |
Deduct: Cash disbursements |
|
|
|
|
Beginning accounts payable…… |
|
60,000 |
|
|
+Purchases for Year 2 [3]………... |
|
600,000 |
|
|
-Ending accounts payable [4]……. |
|
(75,000) |
|
|
Payments to creditors…………….. |
|
585,000 |
|
|
Payments of cash expenses [5]…. |
|
315,920 |
|
|
Payment of notes payable |
|
20,000 |
|
|
Payment of long‑term debt……….. |
|
25,000 |
|
|
Total cash disbursements…………………. |
|
|
|
945,920 |
Net cash flow………………………………… |
|
|
|
$(35,920) |
Less minimum cash balance……………… |
|
|
|
(20,000) |
Cash borrowings expected…………… |
|
|
|
$(55,920) |
Source: http://www.aast.edu/pheed/staffadminview/pdf_retreive.php?url=157_28235_EA419_2012_4__2_1_Ch_10.doc&stafftype=staffcourses
Web site to visit: http://www.aast.edu
Author of the text: indicated on the source document of the above text
If you are the author of the text above and you not agree to share your knowledge for teaching, research, scholarship (for fair use as indicated in the United States copyrigh low) please send us an e-mail and we will remove your text quickly. Fair use is a limitation and exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work. In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, search engines, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test. (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use)
The information of medicine and health contained in the site are of a general nature and purpose which is purely informative and for this reason may not replace in any case, the council of a doctor or a qualified entity legally to the profession.
The following texts are the property of their respective authors and we thank them for giving us the opportunity to share for free to students, teachers and users of the Web their texts will used only for illustrative educational and scientific purposes only.
All the information in our site are given for nonprofit educational purposes
The information of medicine and health contained in the site are of a general nature and purpose which is purely informative and for this reason may not replace in any case, the council of a doctor or a qualified entity legally to the profession.
www.riassuntini.com